Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

ÀÚ¿¬Ä¡ ºÎºÐ °á¼Õ ȯÀÚ¿¡¼­ Å×ÀÌÆÛ ÇüÅÂÀÇ ±¹»ê ÀÓÇöõÆ®(OSSTEM GS III)ÀÇ Áï½ÃÇÏÁß ¼º°ø·ü¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Áö¿¬ÇÏÁß±º°úÀÇ ºñ±³ Àӻ󿬱¸

Clinical Comparison of Immediately Loaded and Delayed Loaded OSSTEM GS III Implant in Partially Edentulous Patients

±¸°­È¸º¹ÀÀ¿ë°úÇÐÁö 2011³â 27±Ç 3È£ p.267 ~ 275
±Ç¹ÎÁ¤, ±è¿µ±Õ, À̾çÁø, ¿©Àμº,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
±Ç¹ÎÁ¤ ( Kwon Min-Jung ) - ºÐ´ç¼­¿ï´ëÇб³º´¿ø Ä¡°úº¸Ã¶°ú
±è¿µ±Õ ( Kim Young-Kyun ) - ºÐ´ç¼­¿ï´ëÇб³º´¿ø ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¿Ü°ú
À̾çÁø ( Lee Yang-Jin ) - ºÐ´ç¼­¿ï´ëÇб³º´¿ø Ä¡°úº¸Ã¶°ú
¿©Àμº ( Yeo In-Seong ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡°úº´¿ø Ä¡°úº¸Ã¶°ú

Abstract

±¸Ä¡ºÎ ºÎºÐ °á¼Õ ȯÀÚ¿¡¼­ Áï½ÃÇÏÁß±º°ú Áö¿¬ÇÏÁß±ºÀÇ ÀÓ»óÀû ¼º°ø·üÀ» ÃøÁ¤Çϱâ À§ÇÑ ÀüÇâÀû ¿¬±¸°¡ °èȹµÇ¾ú´Ù. Áï½ÃÇÏÁß±º¿¡¼­´Â 17¸íÀÇ È¯ÀÚ¿¡ 42°³ÀÇ GSIII ÀÓÇöõÆ®(Osstem, Korea)¸¦ ½Ä¸³ÇÏ°í 48½Ã°£ ¾È¿¡ ÇÏÁßÀ» °¡ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ´ëÁ¶±ºÀÎ Áö¿¬ÇÏÁß±º¿¡¼­´Â 15¸íÀÇ È¯ÀÚ¿¡ 27°³ÀÇ GSIII ÀÓÇöõÆ®¸¦ ½Ä¸³ÇÏ°í Æò±Õ °³¿ù ÈÄ¿¡ ÇÏÁßÀ» °¡ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÇÏÁß Àü 1Â÷¾ÈÁ¤¼ºÀ» ISQ·Î ÃøÁ¤ÇÏ¿´°í ÀÓ»óÁõ»ó, µ¿¿äµµ, ¿¬Á¶Á÷ ¹ÝÀÀÀ» ½Ä¸³ Á÷ÈÄ, 3°³¿ù ÈÄ, 6°³¿ù ÈÄ, 12°³¿ù ÈÄ¿¡ Æò°¡ÇÏ¿´´Ù. º¯¿¬°ñ Èí¼ö·®Àº Ä¡±Ù´Ü ¹æ»ç¼± ¿µ»óÀ¸·Î ÃøÁ¤ÇÏ¿´°í Mann-Whitney test (=0.05)¿Í repeated measured ANOVA (=0.05)·Î µÎ ±ºÀÇ Â÷À̸¦ °ËÁ¤ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ½Ä¸³ Á÷ÈÄ ½ÇÇ豺°ú ´ëÁ¶±ºÀÇ ISQ´Â °¢°¢ °ú À̾ú´Ù. ½ÇÇ豺Àº 95.23%ÀÇ ¼º°ø·üÀ», ´ëÁ¶±ºÀº 100% ¼º°ø·üÀ» ³ªÅ¸³Â´Ù. 3°³¿ù°ú 6°³¿ù ÈÄ ½ÇÇ豺ÀÇ º¯¿¬°ñ Èí¼ö·®Àº ´ëÁ¶±º¿¡ ºñÇØ À¯ÀǼº ÀÖ°Ô ÄÇ´Ù(p<0.05). ÇÏÁö¸¸ 12°³¿ù ÈÄ µÎ ±ºÀÇ Â÷ÀÌ´Â °üÂûµÇÁö ¾Ê¾Ò´Ù (p>0.05). º¯¿¬°ñ Èí¼ö·®Àº ¼ºº°°ú ½Ä¸³À§Ä¡¿¡ µû¸¥ Â÷ÀÌ°¡ ¾ø¾ú´Ù (p>0.05). ½ÇÇèÀÇ ÇÑ°è ³»¿¡¼­, 1Â÷¾ÈÁ¤¼ºÀÌ È¹µæµÈ´Ù¸é ±¸Ä¡ºÎ ½Ä¸³ GSIII ÀÓÇöõÆ®ÀÇ Áï½ÃÇÏÁßÀº ¿¹Áö¼º ÀÖ´Â Ä¡·á¹ýÀ̶ó°í ¿©°ÜÁø´Ù.

This prospective study was designed to compare clinical outcomes of immediately loaded implant with delayed loaded implant in partially posterior edentulous patients. For test group, 42 GS III (Osstem, Korea) implants in 17 patients were loaded within 48 hours after the placement. Control group was 27 implants in 15 patients loaded at from the placement surgery. Before loading, primary stability was evaluated by ISQ value. Clinical symptoms, mobility, soft tissue state was evaluated at baseline, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months of loading. Marginal bone level change was also measured with periapical radiographs. Mann-Whitney test (=0.05) and repeated measured ANOVA (=0.05) was used for marginal bone level change between two groups. At the baseline, mean ISQ value of test group and control group was and respectively. Test group showed 95.23% of success rate and 100% of control group was successful. At 3 and 6months of loading, significantly more bone resorption was observed in test group than in control group (p<0.05). However, there was no significant difference in the bone level change at 12months of loading between two groups (p>0.05). Marginal bone level change showed no significant difference with gender and location (p>0.05). Within the limitation of this study, when primary stability was obtained, immediate loading of GS III implant at posterior region could be predictable treatment option.

Å°¿öµå

ÀÓÇöõÆ®;Áï½ÃÇÏÁß;º¯¿¬°ñ Èí¼ö;ÀüÇâÀû ¿¬±¸;¼º°ø·ü
dental implant;immediate loading;ISQ;marginal bone loss;prospective study;success rate

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI